'Liberal Compromise' between occupiers and occupied, but will it sail?


Scoop

By Hidari, Section Iraq-Iran-Syria
Posted on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 02:44:46 AM EST

First here's the news from the Independent: one of the few (indeed, practically the only) British newspapers that has stood firmly against the invasion and occupation from the beginning.

'Iraq and the United States have finally agreed on a security pact which would mean that US forces would withdraw from Iraq by 2011, American and Iraqi officials said yesterday.

The accord became a major test of strength between the Iraqi government and Washington since negotiations began in March with the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, pictured below, demanding US concessions on the date of the troop withdrawal and immunity for US troops. The pact replaces the UN Security Council resolution enacted after the American invasion...The accord has been on the verge of being signed several times in the past only for fresh objections to be made by the Iraqi government, which has become increasingly confident of its own strength. A compromise has been reached on whether or not US troops can be tried by an Iraqi court if they commit crimes while not engaged in operations. US troops are to withdraw from Iraqi towns and villages by the middle of next year and from Iraq entirely by the middle of 2011 said the government's spokesman, Ali Dabbagh.

He said: "The withdrawal is to be achieved in three years. In 2011, the government at that time will determine whether it needs a new pact or not, and what type of pact will depend on the challenges it faces."

The US administration will present the pact as a sign of its success in Iraq but in fact the accord is very different from originally envisaged by Washington which would largely have continued the occupation as before.'

So far, so good. Or so it would seem.

Patrick Cockburn has been one of the best 'Western' journalists to report on the occupation. But note how different even his take on this is from Al-Jazeera's.  Wheras Cockburn's piece is an attempt to provide propaganda for Obama (The headline begins 'Obama's Plan Vindicated as US Begins Pull Out....'), Al-Jazeera bleakly notes: 'US 'to stay in Iraq until 2011''. It also notes:

'Iraq and the US have finalised a draft agreement that would permit the US military to remain in the country until 2011.

The proposed deal, announced on Wednesday, would also allow - with certain conditions -Iraq to try American troops charged with committing crimes in the country'.

The fact is, as CSM notes: 'recent progress in Iraq is "fragile" and "reversible."

The paper continues: 'Another troubling development in Iraq - one that has received less attention than the sectarian schisms - is the growing divide between a large and increasingly successful military, and a lagging and increasingly disdained civilian government, says Mr. White, now an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington.

"The civilian side of government is terribly weak, dysfunctional, and corrupt, and against that is this burgeoning national army that has allowed for most of what Maliki has achieved," he says. "We could see a building of resentment within the Army against Maliki for taking the credit while failing to put the civilian side in order - and that could lead to some kind of action by the Army."

Iraq scholars, who point out that a similar widening governmental divide in the 1950s led to a coup against Iraq's monarchy, say that Iraq could end up with the kind of authoritarian military government more typical of Middle Eastern regimes if the civilian government is not able to overcome its divisions.

"Of course it's a worrying gap, because continuing down that road could result in a strongman taking power," says Ralph Peters, a former US Army intelligence officer specializing in the Middle East.

One problem is that sectarian relations will face a number of possibilities to unravel before the January elections even take place. On the list of Iraq's "dark clouds" that Petraeus offers on a PowerPoint presentation: Nov. 1. That is supposed to be the first "payday" for the 54,000 mostly Sunni "Sons of Iraq" whom the Maliki government agreed to integrate into the Iraqi security forces.

Moreover, another election is causing a certain turmoil in Iraq: the one taking place in the US on Nov. 4. One reason the US and Iraq have been unable to conclude the status-of-forces agreement (SOFA) to govern the presence of 140,000 foreign troops in Iraq is that some Iraqi politicians may be hedging bets on the next US administration.'

< The Empire Expands | The withdrawal plan that ain't. >

Tags: WjbBPxLS (all tags) :: Add Tags to this Story
Display: Sort:
Display: Sort:

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:
submit story | create account | faq | search